Thread:Samaru163/@comment-1409530-20170725031757/@comment-1409530-20170725033707

Samaru163 wrote: Hello

As I mentioned yesterday when you first asked me if the edits for the page were acceptable, some of them did not flow properly. "A fire bead was among the objects shown to our heroes at Tom's shop," is not the right choice of words, because Tom did not show them one fire bead. He showed them a bottle full of them. This goes back to the original reason why I said the article should not have been altered; the books themselves refer to fire beads as plurals, not singulars.

Singular use still worked in the article, however, which is why I kept the changes to the description at the top. Because that description was for a single bead and what they are capable of. But during the bulk of the article, which is referrencing moments in the books themsleves, it makes more sense to use the plural form, because the book scenes were describing multiple fire beads and not singulars.

'"A fire bead was among the objects shown to our heroes at Tom's shop," is not the right choice of words, because Tom did not show them one fire bead. He showed them a bottle full of them.": He may have shown them a bottle full of them but what he was showing them was a fire bead as opposed to something else.