Board Thread:General Wiki Discussion/@comment-1409530-20170725084635/@comment-1409530-20170728004042

Samaru163 wrote: Hello there.

Jdogno7 everyone on this wiki has been patient with you and willing to help you improve your editing skills. However, time and time again, you have ignored what we have said while fainting innocence and constantly editing articles simply because you think it looks better a certain way, as was the case with the Fire bead article, and the Rithmere article. This is not taking into account your actions back in 2015, where you argued over the order the companions should be listed, and argued over the use of the colon and the semi-colon—an action you did not learn from given your current behaviour.

So to answer your question, yes, it does look like you are making detrimental edits. Instead of looking through our Articles in need of improvement section, you are editing pages that, frankly, are complete or near completion, and making unessisary edits. And when we explain why the edits were not needed, you argue over it, as was the case with the messages you left on my page about the Fire bead article.

Consider this your last warning. Once again, everyone has been willing to help you improve and has tried to explain why your edits weren't good—and in a few cases, we've half-agreed with you. My advice for you is to pick your battles and try to make actual productive changes to the wiki, like adding in information that is missing, instead of minor gramatical fixes like semi-colons.

Otherwise, if this behaviour continues, you will be banned again.

"However, time and time again, you have ignored what we have said while fainting innocence and constantly editing articles simply because you think it looks better a certain way, as was the case with the Fire bead article, and the Rithmere article.": There is a difference between ignoring someone and disagreeing with someone because you have a different point of view. "Fainting innocence"? Do you mean "Feigning innocence"? How have I been "feigning innocence"? "...editing articles simply because you think it looks better a certain way...", that doesn't mean that was necessarily wrong. "as was the case with the Fire bead article, and the Rithmere article.", I was not completely wrong in the changes I wanted to make (to say some of them were not bad changes). "This is not taking into account your actions back in 2015, where you argued over the order the companions should be listed, and argued over the use of the colon and the semi-colon—an action you did not learn from given your current behavior.": With the listing order of the companions, I accept that I was outargued there but the use of the colon and the semi-colon, I was not necessarily wrong on that particular point.

"So to answer your question, yes, it does look like you are making detrimental edits.": Are you saying that I am deliberately doing so? "Instead of looking through our Articles in need of improvement section, you are editing pages that, frankly, are complete or near completion, and making unnecessary edits.": That is your view. "And when we explain why the edits were not needed, you argue over it, as was the case with the messages you left on my page about the Fire bead article.": Disagreeing with someone is not the same as disrespecting them.

"Consider this your last warning. Once again, everyone has been willing to help you improve and has tried to explain why your edits weren't good—and in a few cases, we've half-agreed with you. My advice for you is to pick your battles and try to make actual productive changes to the wiki, like adding in information that is missing, instead of minor grammatical fixes like semi-colons.": "My advice for you is to pick your battles and try to make actual productive changes to the wiki, like adding in information that is missing, instead of minor grammatical fixes like semi-colons.", I have added in information that is missing at times. Most recently I added in that a Fire bead was used against the Glus in the anime. Those "minor" grammatical fixes are not necessarily wrong.