Board Thread:General Wiki Discussion/@comment-1409530-20170723051734/@comment-13471095-20170724041144

Hello there.

I've read though your arguments for why the article should be changed to singular, but in my opinion, it makes sense to keep it as it is. As has been stated before, they are referred to in the plural form in the books, and in the past, this wiki has voted on keeping naming sistems similar to their book form (such as listing the trio in the order of Lief, Barda, and Jasmine, unless we are on Barda or Jasmine's page, in which case it is listed as Barda, Lief, Jasmine, or Jasmine, Lief, Barda).

While you are correct in that each Fire Bede can be used individually, the fact that they are never sold individually also warrents merrit to the article staying as it is. It is the same with the Water Eaters; they are sold in bulk, but you only need a small ammount to perfomr the function. However, in the books, Fire Bedes are 90% of the time always used in bulk, usually as projectiles. If there were more instances of individual Fre Bedes being used, maybe I could see a reason for giving the article a singlular name. But as is, I say we stick to the naming style from the book for the title, and if you want to mention a single bede in one of your edits, such as, "A single fire bede can be used to start a fire simply by being struck," then you can.

That's my two cents. Sorry if it's a little redundant, but the point I was trying to say was that I think we should stick to the book's naming style as we have done in the past.