Thread:Samaru163/@comment-31660698-20170727123403/@comment-1409530-20170801041645

Samaru163 wrote: Hello there

Az-Zure is right. At this point, he isn't even trying to defend himself or his actins. He is just counter-arguing everything we say with, "how do you know that?" "Why is that so?" "Why do I have to listen to the majority if it's possibly wrong?" "Can you explain it?" This is not how someone would act if they legitimately want to improve. He would be explaining his argument instead of picking apart our arguments piece by piece. So let's just ignore him and see if he gets back to editing. If he doesn't go back to editing, then I'm going to ban him on the ground of being disruptive and confontation to the wiki and its editing staff.

"At this point, he isn't even trying to defend himself or his actions.": What actions would those be? "He is just counter-arguing everything we say with, 'how do you know that?' 'Why is that so?' 'Why do I have to listen to the majority if it's possibly wrong?' 'Can you explain it?'": Is it wrong to ever ask why something is so? Or to ask for an explanation to gain understanding? I do bother to fully explain my point of view. However there are times when someone disagrees with such. That is fine. People are allowed to disagree. But I will question what I do not fully understand about someone's given argument for something I have done to be wrong. "This is not how someone would act if they legitimately want to improve.": Improvement means agreeing with everyone without question? "He would be explaining his argument instead of picking apart our arguments piece by piece.": I do explain my arguments. You are allowed to point out any flaws in my arguments but I am not allowed to do so to yours? That is absolute arrogance. "So let's just ignore him and see if he gets back to editing.": I do intend to edit after dealing with these disagreements. "If he doesn't go back to editing, then I'm going to ban him on the ground of being disruptive and confrontational to the wiki and its editing staff.": I thought based on what I have been told that if there is a disagreement then talk pages/message walls/forums/ are the best place to resolve it. Now you are saying that is also problematic?!