Board Thread:General Wiki Discussion/@comment-1409530-20170725084635/@comment-1409530-20170730103019

Creative Dream wrote: They are unnecessary because the article is not in need of improvement (otherwise there will be a template at the top of the page). It was fine the way it was. The only person who thought it was not fine, is you. Then the majority of contributors did not agree with the changes you wanted to make.

All of them so far since you have started editing again. Why don't you forget about the grammar/punctuation and try to add some information to an article, for a change?

No it is more like a warning because if you do not change your ways you will risk a ban once more. That is what we are trying to avoid, right? By the way have you not been paying attention?? I had a lot of patience with you when you requested to edit again?? Did you seriously forget that??

"They are unnecessary because the article is not in need of improvement (otherwise there will be a template at the top of the page). It was fine the way it was. The only person who thought it was not fine, is you. Then the majority of contributors did not agree with the changes you wanted to make.": "They are unnecessary because the article is not in need of improvement (otherwise there will be a template at the top of the page).", Maybe some articles are declared complete or perfect a little to soon. Either that or some people don't want to admit that what they wrote can't be improved upon. "It was fine the way it was.", What is your basis for this? "The only person who thought it was not fine, is you.", That does not mean I am wrong about that. "Then the majority of contributors did not agree with the changes you wanted to make.", That is strange I don't remember anyone but you, Az-Zure and Samaru getting involved. That does not count as the majority of contributors.

"All of them so far since you have started editing again. Why don't you forget about the grammar/punctuation and try to add some information to an article, for a change?": "All of them so far since you have started editing again.", That is an exaggeration. There were some that were okay. "Why don't you forget about the grammar/punctuation and try to add some information to an article, for a change?", I added about how a fire bead was used against the Glus in the anime to the article about the object. I added the "Maze of the Beast" (episode) to the "Maze of the Beast" disambiguation page. So it is not like I have not and will not add information ever.

"No it is more like a warning because if you do not change your ways you will risk a ban once more. That is what we are trying to avoid, right? By the way have you not been paying attention?? I had a lot of patience with you when you requested to edit again?? Did you seriously forget that??": Yes we are all trying to avoid a ban. I was talking about others not you.