Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-5411265-20130513092026/@comment-5411265-20130513203045

Why would we have to resize images if we were to go with option 2? Images on articles are already 250 px wide anyway.

Edit: Sorry, I get what you mean now. Images added to an article can easily be modified to any width by clicking 'Thumbnail' then selecting the width. So the size isn't a problem because images on articles will have to be below 250px anyway. That also brings up another question: What width should images in the article be?