Board Thread:General Wiki Discussion/@comment-1409530-20170725084635/@comment-30038231-20170729083722

It is not always desired because there is a lot of other work to do instead of making small grammar changes that are not even really necessary. Okay, Jdogno7 have you not seen what happened when you openend the discussion about the fire beads article? That is what a call a destructive conflict.

'''All of your edits so far have led to issues while the majority of people edit pages with no issues. '''Now, if you still do not get it, read that sentence again. This has been mentioned before but maybe and just maybe you should reconsider your editing style. You can also opt to add more information to an article in need of information instead of just making really small (undesired) grammar/punctation edits.

And Jdogno7, I should really watch out if I were you. People are trying really hard to work with you but I can tell you that there is little to no patience left. It is your attitude, I could lecture you about constructive/destructive conflicts and how it works and were it goes wrong with you. But don't you get it already?