Board Thread:General Wiki Discussion/@comment-1409530-20170725084635/@comment-1409530-20170729100346

Creative Dream wrote: It is not always desired because there is a lot of other work to do instead of making small grammar changes that are not even really necessary. Okay, Jdogno7 have you not seen what happened when you openend the discussion about the fire beads article? That is what a call a destructive conflict.

'''All of your edits so far have led to issues while the majority of people edit pages with no issues. '''Now, if you still do not get it, read that sentence again. This has been mentioned before but maybe and just maybe you should reconsider your editing style. You can also opt to add more information to an article in need of information instead of just making really small (undesired) grammar/punctation edits.

And Jdogno7, I should really watch out if I were you. People are trying really hard to work with you but I can tell you that there is little to no patience left. It is your attitude, I could lecture you about constructive/destructive conflicts and how it works and were it goes wrong with you. But don't you get it already?

"It is not always desired because there is a lot of other work to do instead of making small grammar changes that are not even really necessary. Okay, Jdogno7 have you not seen what happened when you opened the discussion about the fire beads article? That is what a call a destructive conflict.": "It is not always desired because there is a lot of other work to do instead of making small grammar changes that are not even really necessary.", why are they unnecessary? Bigger question is: Are they wrong? "Okay, Jdogno7 have you not seen what happened when you opened the discussion about the fire beads article?", which thread are you referring to?

"All of your edits so far have led to issues while the majority of people edit pages with no issues. Now, if you still do not get it, read that sentence again. This has been mentioned before but maybe and just maybe you should reconsider your editing style. You can also opt to add more information to an article in need of information instead of just making really small (undesired) grammar/punctuation edits.": "All of your edits so far have led to issues while the majority of people edit pages with no issues.", All of them?! I find that hard to believe. "This has been mentioned before but maybe and just maybe you should reconsider your editing style.", What about my editing style is problematic? "You can also opt to add more information to an article in need of information instead of just making really small (undesired) grammar/punctuation edits.", How are they undesired? Of course I will also add information to articles. I added information to both Lief and Jasmine's articles about their roles in the Star of Deltora Series.

"And Jdogno7, I should really watch out if I were you. People are trying really hard to work with you but I can tell you that there is little to no patience left. It is your attitude, I could lecture you about constructive/destructive conflicts and how it works and were it goes wrong with you. But don't you get it already?": "And Jdogno7, I should really watch out if I were you.", is that a threat? "People are trying really hard to work with you but I can tell you that there is little to no patience left.", Maybe there was little to no patience to begin with. "It is your attitude, I could lecture you about constructive/destructive conflicts and how it works and were it goes wrong with you.", What about my attitude? Well why don't you explain to me about "how it works and where it goes wrong" with me? "But don't you get it already?", in other words I am asking a question that I already know the answer to for no rationale reason including to make a point by getting others to think about the answer. I find that insulting.